The right to the propagation of life, such as the right to life itself, is a human right. All people are entitled to this invulnerable and inalienable right based on their individual dignity. Every person is entitled to human rights’ protection, independent from one’s social standing, one’s religion or other criteria for social differences – simply because one was born a human.
Despite the universal validity of human rights, in many countries, their interpretation and practical implementation still depends on specific political, religious and cultural characteristics. This has consequences for what parents will be allowed and expecting, in combination with population policy.
The invasion of the government in people’s private lives has to always be met with mistrust. When political and other sanctions decrease or even repeal people’s freedoms to decide upon the number of children they want to have does not only violate norms, but also infringes on human rights.
In addition, such an approach misses its target. Population policy that is not based on majority approval has few chances for lasting success. Whereas an ethically, legitimized population policy is based on the approval of enlightened people with freedom of choice, contraceptive means and other measures, involuntary programs must face permanent pressure. If pressure decreases, success is limited. Furthermore, governmental pressure and sanctions, like the ones used in the past (e.g. India in the 1970s), have led to long term damage related to the idea of family planning.
Requirements for an appropriate and responsible population policy are:
Stand: August 2011
PDF Version
New discussion paper in English
The Demographic State of the Nation - How volutary work aids the region (2011)
Africa's Demographic Challenges - How a young population can make development possible (2011)


in the Online Handbook Demography